- ChaseLawyers Newsletter
- Posts
- Music Copyright Cases: One Dismissed, One Reignited
Music Copyright Cases: One Dismissed, One Reignited
Two major cases are testing the boundaries of copyright in music — one fading out, the other coming back stronger. A judge has dismissed the much-discussed lawsuit over Drake’s “Not Like Us” diss track, ruling that there was no valid claim for copyright infringement. Meanwhile, the music publishing industry is gaining ground in a separate fight: a federal judge has reinstated a lawsuit against AI company Anthropic, allowing copyright claims to proceed after the court found the tech firm’s own disclosures undercut its defense. Together, these cases highlight the evolving legal landscape where music, AI, and fair use collide.
Hi there,
This week’s newsletter looks at two important music copyright cases — one wrapped up quickly, the other heating up again thanks to new revelations.
First, the lawsuit over Drake’s Kendrick Lamar diss track “Not Like Us” has been tossed. The judge found that the underlying copyright claim had no real basis — reinforcing that not every high-profile release automatically invites liability.
But over in the AI world, things are playing out differently. The National Music Publishers’ Association just scored a win in court after a judge revived its lawsuit against AI startup Anthropic. The key twist? Anthropic’s own technical documents were used to argue that it trained its AI using copyrighted lyrics — breathing new life into a case the company hoped to shut down early.
Judge Dismisses Copyright Lawsuit Over Drake’s “Not Like Us”
The lawsuit against Universal Music Group and Drake over the Kendrick Lamar diss track “Not Like Us” has officially been dismissed. The plaintiff, who claimed his own song was illegally sampled, failed to register his work before filing — a procedural requirement under U.S. copyright law. The judge found no substantial similarities between the two songs, and reinforced that copyright law protects specific expressions, not general ideas or shared genre conventions. The decision ends one of the summer’s buzziest legal skirmishes in music — and shows the importance of clear ownership and registration when bringing claims.
Anthropic’s Own Guardrails Reignite AI Music Copyright Lawsuit
A federal judge has allowed music publishers to proceed with their copyright infringement case against Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude. The lawsuit alleges that Claude can reproduce full copyrighted lyrics when prompted — a claim Anthropic hoped to dismiss early. But a twist in the case came from Anthropic’s own “guardrails,” which it disclosed as part of its defense. The judge found that these internal safety tools, designed to block copyrighted responses, actually supported the publishers' claims that the system can generate protected material. With this decision, the case moves forward — and may set a major precedent for how AI interacts with copyrighted music.
Stay in the Know
Don’t miss out on the full stories and insights shaping the future of entertainment. Tap into these trends now to stay ahead of the curve and navigate the industry's biggest transformations.
If you have any questions or want to schedule a consultation with one of our attorneys use the button below or contact us by telephone in Miami at 305-373-7665.
INDUSTRY NEWS
Universal Music Group Beats Drake’s “Not Like Us” Defamation Suit | Anthropic’s own guardrails revive full copyright lawsuit from litigious music publishers |
FROM OUR CLIENTS

“ChaseLawyers provided outstanding service and exceeded my expectations. They were incredibly helpful and got my matter sorted out quickly and efficiently. From the very beginning, their professionalism and dedication were evident. The team kept me informed at every step and made the entire process stress-free. I highly recommend ChaseLawyers to anyone in need of expert legal assistance. They truly go above and beyond for their clients.”
Diana B

Exceptional communication with this entire law firm from the very first call. Tomas Michelson was honest, straightforward, understanding and handled my small business needs like family. I continually felt like Tomas understood and never lost sight of my desired outcome. The entire firm cared about me and my complex legal needs.
George M
OUR BLOGS
![]() | What’s Really Going on With Music Royalties in 2025 This piece breaks down the shifting landscape of royalties — from streaming splits to songwriter payouts. If you’re an artist or rights holder, staying updated is no longer optional. |
![]() | Defending Against Defamation in the Entertainment Industry From tabloid rumors to viral takedowns, this article explains how public figures can fight back — and what defamation law actually protects. |
CHECK OUT OUR OTHER RESOURCES
MEET OUR PARTNERS
We understand the unique challenges you face as a creative, and we’re prepared to protect your interests.
![]() | Barry Oliver Chase Barry Chase, Esq. is an honors graduate of Yale College and Harvard Law School, and the founding partner of ChaseLawyers®. In addition to his entertainment attorney legal practice, Mr. Chase lectures regularly on the representation of media personalities, the legal “do’s and don’ts” of music, television, and film production, and the intricacies of film rights option agreements. |
![]() | Greg Bloom Gregory Bloom, Esq., is a sports and entertainment attorney who concentrates his practice on the representation of athletes, entertainers, and corporate businesses in connection with transactional work and litigation issues ranging from the very simple to the extremely complex. |
![]() | Alexander Loveyko Alexander Loveyko, Esq. is a New York-licensed attorney and Partner at ChaseLawyers, focusing on intellectual property, entertainment, and Internet law. Based in Miami, he represents creators, Web3 startups, and international talent, advising on IP, licensing, music catalog deals, and immigration matters. |







