- ChaseLawyers Newsletter
- Posts
- Cybersquatting, AI Theft, and the Fight for Artist Rights
Cybersquatting, AI Theft, and the Fight for Artist Rights
Slipknot is suing to reclaim the domain name slipknot.com, which they’ve never owned due to a 2001 registration by an anonymous third party. The band accuses the domain holder of cybersquatting and profiting from their brand without permission. Meanwhile, indie musicians are fighting back against AI company Udio, alleging it scraped and trained on their music without consent — harming their ability to earn a living. This new lawsuit adds a fresh twist to the growing list of AI copyright cases, shifting the spotlight to smaller creators rather than major labels.
Hi there,
Today’s newsletter spotlights two legal battles that may help define the future of artist rights — one centered on domain ownership, the other on AI-generated music.
First up, Slipknot is finally taking action after more than two decades of not owning their own dotcom. In a new lawsuit, the band alleges that slipknot.com has been used in bad faith to divert fans and monetize unofficial merch — a potential violation of U.S. cybersquatting and trademark laws.
On another front, independent musicians are suing AI startup Udio for copyright infringement, unfair competition, and even privacy violations. Unlike earlier suits led by major labels, this one highlights the disproportionate harm AI can cause to small creators — including lost royalties, sync deals, and job opportunities.
Slipknot Sues Over Domain Name Registered in 2001
Slipknot is suing to seize control of slipknot.com, alleging the current (anonymous) owner registered the domain in bad faith back in 2001. The band claims the site misleads fans and profits from affiliate links to unofficial merch. Though domain registration is normally “first come, first served,” U.S. law offers protection when trademarked names are used with intent to profit unfairly. Slipknot’s case invokes the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and seeks control of the domain after 23 years.
Udio Hit With New Lawsuit from Independent Artists
Music AI company Udio faces a new copyright lawsuit — not from the majors, but from a group of independent musicians. The artists allege Udio scraped their recordings and lyrics without permission and used them to train a commercial AI tool that now competes with human creators. The lawsuit also includes privacy claims under Illinois law, accusing Udio of exploiting biometric data and voiceprints. This case raises the stakes by spotlighting the unequal burden AI may place on artists without industry backing.
Stay in the Know
Don’t miss out on the full stories and insights shaping the future of entertainment. Tap into these trends now to stay ahead of the curve and navigate the industry's biggest transformations.
If you have any questions or want to schedule a consultation with one of our attorneys use the button below or contact us by telephone in Miami at 305-373-7665.
INDUSTRY NEWS
Slipknot sue cybersquatter that has controlled the band’s dotcom domain since 2001 | New Udio lawsuit hones in on the “significant and unequal harm” inflicted on independent musicians by music AI |
FROM OUR CLIENTS

“ChaseLawyers provided outstanding service and exceeded my expectations. They were incredibly helpful and got my matter sorted out quickly and efficiently. From the very beginning, their professionalism and dedication were evident. The team kept me informed at every step and made the entire process stress-free. I highly recommend ChaseLawyers to anyone in need of expert legal assistance. They truly go above and beyond for their clients.”
Diana B

Exceptional communication with this entire law firm from the very first call. Tomas Michelson was honest, straightforward, understanding and handled my small business needs like family. I continually felt like Tomas understood and never lost sight of my desired outcome. The entire firm cared about me and my complex legal needs.
George M
OUR BLOGS
![]() | Protecting Your Domain Name: A Guide for Content Creators and Businesses Your domain is part of your brand — losing it can cost you traffic, trust, and money. This article breaks down how to protect your name online and what to do if someone else grabs it first. |
![]() | Navigating the Legal Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Entertainment From deepfakes to synthetic voices, AI is changing how content gets made — and who owns it. This guide explores key legal issues facing artists, studios, and tech developers today. |
CHECK OUT OUR OTHER RESOURCES
MEET OUR PARTNERS
We understand the unique challenges you face as a creative, and we’re prepared to protect your interests.
![]() | Barry Oliver Chase Barry Chase, Esq. is an honors graduate of Yale College and Harvard Law School, and the founding partner of ChaseLawyers®. In addition to his entertainment attorney legal practice, Mr. Chase lectures regularly on the representation of media personalities, the legal “do’s and don’ts” of music, television, and film production, and the intricacies of film rights option agreements. |
![]() | Greg Bloom Gregory Bloom, Esq., is a sports and entertainment attorney who concentrates his practice on the representation of athletes, entertainers, and corporate businesses in connection with transactional work and litigation issues ranging from the very simple to the extremely complex. |
![]() | Alexander Loveyko Alexander Loveyko, Esq. is a New York-licensed attorney and Partner at ChaseLawyers, focusing on intellectual property, entertainment, and Internet law. Based in Miami, he represents creators, Web3 startups, and international talent, advising on IP, licensing, music catalog deals, and immigration matters. |







