- ChaseLawyers Newsletter
- Archive
- Page 2
Archive
Who’s Accountable? The Fight Over Copyright Moves Into New Territory
This week, copyright enforcement is facing two major challenges — one from internet providers, the other from generative AI. Record labels are calling out the U.S. government for backing Cox Communications in a long-running piracy case, arguing the move weakens copyright protections for artists. Meanwhile, Disney and Universal are suing AI platform Midjourney, alleging it trained on and reproduced copyrighted visual works without permission. These legal battles could shape how — or if — copyright law keeps up with tech.
Rights, Royalties, and Reputation: What Happens When Creators Push Back
This week, two major lawsuits are making headlines — one over money, the other over image. Sony Music is suing LiveOne, a music and podcast platform, for allegedly using hundreds of Sony-owned tracks without paying the required licensing fees. Meanwhile, Russell Simmons has filed a defamation suit over the #MeToo documentary On the Record, arguing that the film misrepresented key facts. Whether it’s about unpaid royalties or public portrayal, both cases show how quickly entertainment law turns into high-stakes litigation.
Music Rights in the Spotlight: Two New Battles Take Aim at Platforms
This week, the legal system is putting online platforms under pressure — again. Eminem’s publisher has filed a lawsuit against Facebook and Instagram for allegedly using his music without a license in thousands of user-generated videos. Meanwhile, internet service provider RCN is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on whether ISPs should be held liable for online piracy. As enforcement tactics evolve, these cases could help define who’s responsible when copyrighted music ends up online — and who’s on the hook.
Who Owns What? Big Battles Over Talent and AI Are Heating Up
This week, two high-profile disputes are putting questions of ownership and control front and center in the entertainment world. Disney has filed a lawsuit against YouTube parent company Google, accusing it of poaching a top licensing executive just weeks before major renewal negotiations. Meanwhile, Senator Josh Hawley is pushing for tougher rules to protect creatives from AI-generated content — and calling out Hollywood studios for their silence. Together, these headlines reflect an industry grappling with loyalty, leverage, and the limits of IP protection.
Creative Industries at a Crossroads: New Laws Aim to Shape the Future of Film and AI
Two major political moves this week could reshape the creative world. In Texas, lawmakers introduced the “Texas is the New Hollywood” Act — a bold push to make the state a magnet for film and TV production. Meanwhile in Washington, a Trump-endorsed tax bill is raising alarm for its potential to block future AI regulation, leaving artists and creators exposed to fast-moving technologies with few legal safeguards. As the industry evolves, so do the stakes.
Creative Rights vs. AI: Two Alarming Moves Shake the Music Industry
This week, tensions between tech and copyright hit a boiling point. SoundCloud updated its terms of use with language suggesting user content could be used for AI training—sparking immediate backlash from artists. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump fired the top U.S. copyright official, raising red flags about the future of intellectual property policy in the age of artificial intelligence. For creators, musicians, and rights holders, these headlines point to a deeper question: who really controls your work in the AI era?
Cracking Down on Content: What Washington’s New Moves Mean for Creators
Two big decisions out of D.C. this week could reshape the way creative work is made and shared. Former President Trump wants to slap a 100% tariff on films produced outside the U.S., aiming to revive American movie-making. And in a rare show of bipartisan agreement, Congress passed the ‘Take It Down Act’ — a new law requiring platforms to quickly remove AI-generated deepfake porn. Whether you're behind the camera or behind a brand, the message is clear: the rules around content are changing fast.
Copyright in the Spotlight: From 50 Cent to Crumbl Cookies, Who Owns the Rights?
This week, two high-profile lawsuits are drawing attention to copyright enforcement in entertainment and brand marketing. 50 Cent is suing to block the release of SkillHouse, claiming the producers used his likeness without payment or permission. Meanwhile, Warner Music Group is going after Crumbl Cookies for allegedly using over 150 songs in social media promotions without a license. For artists, influencers, and businesses alike, these cases are a sharp reminder: in today’s content-driven world, owning the rights—or using them correctly—can mean everything.
Power on Trial: What the Live Nation and Google Lawsuits Mean for Creators
This week, two landmark cases put corporate power in the spotlight. The DOJ moved to break up Live Nation and Ticketmaster, accusing them of stifling competition and controlling the live event market. At the same time, a federal court ruled that Google’s ad business violated antitrust laws by favoring its own platforms and limiting fair access. For artists, venues, creators, and digital entrepreneurs, these cases signal a potential shift. As regulators target monopolies in music and media, a more open, competitive landscape could be on the horizon.
Crypto Crossroads: The Legal Shakeup Hits Washington
This week, U.S. crypto policy took a dramatic and unexpected turn. The Department of Justice quietly dismantled its crypto crime division, pulling back federal enforcement efforts even as digital currency fraud remains a major concern. Meanwhile, the U.S. quietly passed its first comprehensive crypto law, signaling a shift from aggressive prosecution to structured regulation. Together, these developments mark a turning point—reshaping the rules of the digital economy and opening a new chapter in the battle between innovation and oversight. As enforcement retreats and legislation steps forward, the legal spotlight on crypto just got a whole lot brighter.
From Sidelines to Salaries: The Game-Changer in College Sports
This week, college athletics took a historic legal turn. The NCAA is nearing a $2.7 billion settlement in the House v. NCAA case, potentially compensating thousands of former student-athletes and rewriting the rules around NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) rights. At the same time, Colorado passed a first-of-its-kind law requiring colleges to directly pay their athletes, bypassing third-party deals and igniting a national debate. These moves not only challenge the traditional amateur model - they open a floodgate of legal questions around licensing, branding, and income rights for student-athletes. As the playing field shifts, the law is becoming the real MVP.
AI Imitation, Legal Limitation
This week, two major developments shook the intersection of AI and intellectual property. YouTube is rolling out stricter policies to curb misleading AI-generated content—particularly fake movie trailers—just as viral examples continue racking up views and monetization dollars. Meanwhile, Studio Ghibli is pushing back against unauthorized AI content that replicates its signature style without permission. These moments highlight a growing paradox: while creators and companies call for stronger protections, some of those same companies are quietly benefitting from the buzz. As generative tools evolve, so do the ethical and legal questions around who owns creative output—and who profits from it.